Foundation for structural anthropology property

Main Article Content

Jorge Enrique Guier

Abstract

It is necessary to try, in a work of the class of the Present, to try to define, as a first step, is a structure, the same as its components, and from now on to start to more ambitious theories. As a fundamental principle it should be established that the notion of social structure does not refer to empirical reality, but rather to models that have been built according to that reality. This shows that there are two primary notions that are confused, such as that of social structure and social relationship, both being distinct. This is the raw material or base for the construction of the models that will serve as the basis for the first. However, the structure cannot be identified with the set of social relationships that are presented in a given society. "Structure research does not claim for itself a change of its own between social facts; rather, they are a method that can be applied to various ethnological problems, and resemble the forms of structural analysis used in different domains" (Levi-Strauss, 1970 A, 251).
In order for the chosen models to deserve the structure name, they must fill four conditions: 1) the structure presents the character of a system and consists of many ligation elements, so that the modification of one only becomes the transformation of all others; 2) each model belongs to a group of transformations, and these transformations belong to a model of the same family, from which a group these transformations form a group of models; 3) all these indicated properties allow you to predict how a model will react when one of the elements is transformed; and (4) the model must be developed in such a way that its operation gives account of all the facts observed.


 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
GuierJ. (2021). Foundation for structural anthropology property. Acta Académica, 4(Mayo), 89-95. Retrieved from http://201.196.25.14/index.php/actas/article/view/1040
Section
Acta Jurídica

References

Burridge, K.O.L. y otros. 1970 - "Estructuralismo, mito y totemismo” Recopilador Edmund Leach. Colección Pensamiento Estructuralista. Dirigido por José Sazbón. Traducido por María Elisa Latorre y Cristina Iglesia. Ediciones Nueva Visión. Buenos Aires.
Frazer, Sir James George. 1969 - "La Rama Dorada - Magia y religión” Traducción de Elizabeth y Tadeo I. Campuzano. Cuarta Reimpresión. Fondo de Cultura Económica, México.
Guier, Jorge Enrique. 1973 - "Incesto, Matrimonio y Derecho” en "Revista de Ciencias Políticas” Setiembre 1973, N° 22. Facultad de Derecho. Universidad de Costa Rica, San José.
Hegel, Jorge Federico. 1968 - "Filosofía del Derecho". Editorial Claridad, Argentina.
Herskovits, Melville J. 1964 - “El hombre y sus obras - La ciencia de la antropología cultural". Traducción de M. Hernández Barroso. Segunda edición en español. Fondo de Cultura Económica, México.
Lévi, Strauss, Claude. 1967 - "Respuestas a algunas preguntas" en "Problemas del estructuralismo". Editorial Universitaria Córdoba.
1969 - "Las Estructuras elementales del parentesco" Traducción de Merie Thérese. Cevasco. Biblioteca de Psicología Social y Sociología. Volumen 44. Editorial Paidós, Buenos Aires.
1970 A – "Antropología Estructural” Traducido de la nueva edición 1961, por Eliseo Verón. Manualidades de Eudeba: Antropología. Eudeba. Editorial Universitaria de Buenos Aires. Tercera edición. Buenos Aires.
1970 B - "El pensamiento salvaje" Traducción de Francisco González Aramburo. Breviario del Fondo de Cultura. Económica, N° 137. Primera reimpresión. Fondo de Cultura Económica. México.