Critical approaches

Abstract

"As a doctor, a poet and a madman, we all have a little bit," but we're likely to have more than crazy, because madness is anarchy itself, which accommodates everything. A lot of doctor, because there's a good dose of anarchy in medicine. And less poet, for there if intuition and beauty are required; though observing what happens now in poetry... well, anyone.
The fact is that today we want to exercise our right to medicine, and specifically to that branch that is most at our mercy, because it is the most anarchic: psychiatry, or, say better, "psychiatristization".
Freud's theories originated as many schools as disciples had, and as Koestler tells us in Can Psiquiatrists Be Trusted, diagnosis is a function of the nationality of the psychiatrist, Who has not been annoyed by the propensity to "siquiatrizar" who show scholars of that science? They explain all human behavior in terms of pathology and do analysis even by remote control. There are them of Christ, of Genghis Khan, of Akhkhathon, of St. Teresa, etc.